Archive for the ‘Industry’ Category

What Happens in at CES in Vegas Won’t Stay in Vegas

Friday, January 8th, 2010

ACEIVAlasvegass  the inventor and supplier of the leading connected digital photo frame, CEIVA believes that what happens in Vegas doesn’t need to stay in Vegas. Because connected frame technology allows for easy sharing of photo memories from frame to frame to frame, CEIVA is running a “CEIVA Las Vegas” Photo Sharing Contest in conjunction with the 2010 International Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES) happening this week in Las Vegas.

CEIVA wants CES attendees to share their photos. The “CEIVA Las Vegas” photo contest invites CES show-goers and exhibitors to enter this one-of-a-kind photo-sharing contest simply by sending in their photos showcasing their experiences of CES. Each photo shared is an entry toward winning a CEIVA Pro 80 Digital Photo Frame(TM) Twin Pack with two one-year PicturePlans(R), valued at $439.00

Entry is easy. CES attendees simply email their photos from this year’s trade show to CES@ceiva.com by midnight PT on Monday, January 11, 2010. Contest entries will be available through www.ceiva.com and continually updated and displayed on the CEIVA Facebook page throughout CES 2010. The winner will be announced on Tuesday, January 12 at www.ceiva.com.

For more information and terms & conditions on the “CEIVA Las Vegas” Photo Contest, go to www.ceiva.com. Questions about the contest can also be directed to CEIVA Joe “Vegas” via email: ceivajoe@ceiva.com, via Twitter @ceivajoe or to CEIVA on Facebook.

2 New Frames Display It AND Print It. But Are They Worth It?

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Recently 2 new digital frames with a built-in photo printing features were announced. One was the Sony DPP-700 the other is Mimo’s iMo Foto Frame. While both manufacturers hope “easy printing convenience” will be a desirable feature, consumers may ask some simple questions that ultimately determine if these frames a worth buying.

SonySony’s new printing frame has a 7-inch 800 x 480 WVGA screen, include in it are 21 different time and date templates, 1GB of internal memory, a micro SD card slot and a USB interface. Its built-in printer produces 4 x 6-inch photos with a resolution of 300 x 300 dpi. The Sony DPP-F700, for sale in mid-November, has a suggested list price of $290. Compatible color print packs include SVM-F40P, F120P, F40L1, and F120L.

MimoMimo’s iMo, which at $229.99 is priced $60 lower than the Sony frame, features a 8-inch 800×600 LCD display and photo card slots for CD, SD, MS, MMC and xD cards, a remote control and a USB interface as well. Its built in printer is able to produce 4-inch x 6-inch photos with 300×300dpi resolution. The frame comes with paper cartridge for 36 prints. Mimo also offers a 24 print replacement cartridge.

SmartpartsBoth of these 2 new “printing” frames enter the segment of the market that until now was only occupied by Smartparts. Smartparts just introduced their SP8PRT 8-Inch Digital Picture Frame into the market in the first quarter of this year. Surprisingly, while the SP8PRT originally had a list price of $299.99 it currently is selling for only $84.58 on Amazon!  I gotta admit that at that price, which equates to a 72% discount, I can’t help but wonder why they already are so deeply discounted. Hmmmm…..

Anyway, before consumers buy any one of these frames they will surely have a few questions about digital printing frames such as:

  • What is the actual single print cost compared to a traditional photo lab print?
  • What is the quality of the photo print? Will the image last or fad?
  • Will photos, that require a lot of one color, use up so much of that specific color that ultimately it reduces the cartridges print output so that it is less than 36 prints?
  • How readily available locally will the replacement print cartridges be?  Are replacement print cartridges only available on-line?
  • Will the cartridges dry up if not used often enough?
  • Would it be wiser to invest in a new home printer that also has photo printing capabilities?
  • If a frame is discontinued will cartridges still be available?

I do know that currently the print cartridges w/paper for all 3 frames are available and each has a list prices of $19.99. That means a single print from a cartridge that prints 36, 4×6-inch prints cost will about 55¢ each. However, since I could not find a local store that carried any cartridges, I had to factor in an additional $7 to $10 for shipping. When you add shipping fees a single print will cost about 72¢ to 83¢ each.  Will consumers perceive this “convenience” as an expensive luxury when compared to the typical 4×6 photo print at a local drug store that costs about 19¢?

So while instant printing might initially seem like a nice convenience, in these tough economic times when every penny counts, Sony and Mimo’s frames might not be worth it when the consumers realizes that they can easily upload/take a picture file and get an inexpensive print at a local drug, grocery or big box store conveniently located in their neighborhood for only 19¢. Plus, they won’t need to spend a great deal of time running around trying to find a replacement print cartridges or paying extra in shipping fees should the cartridge only be available on line.

Ultimately the consumer will decide if digital frames with the convenience of built in printers is an added expense that is really worth taking a chance on. But, what ever the consumer finally does decide, I bet right now Sony and Mimo would like to know what Smartparts knows.

7″ Pandigital WiFi Frame: What Once Was Found Was Lost Again

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Pandigital PAN7000DFDigital photo frames are often criticized by technology gurus for being simple and mundane gadgets. If this is so it causes me to wonder how some manufactures still can make them so exasperating.

Wanting to get the full consumer experience I recently purchased Pandigital frame from a local electronics superstore for review.  From the box I learned that 7” Pandigital frame has the following features: 1GB Internal Memory that holds up to holds up to 6400 images, LCD display, 4:3 Aspect Ratio,  SD/MS/MS-PRO/MMC/XD Card Reader compatibility, remote control, alarm clock, calendar, programmable ON/Off timer, audio, video and is both bluetooth and WiFi compatible.

While I selected the Pandigital PAN7000DW specifically for its WiFi function, I was soon to learn that getting WiFi was not going to be easy. While the frame’s box was quick to communicate that it is WiFi compatible, only after reading through the instruction manual did I learn that the generic WiFi adaptor I also bought for it would not work. Buried deep in the user’s manual, which is sealed in the frame’s box, are instructions to specifically buy a Pandigital WiFi adaptor… which, inconveniently, only can be purchased online for $23.99.

With a suggested list price of $99.99 the frame, the Pandigital PAN7000DW has a nice crisp picture will integrate with a variety of home interior styles.  However the physical design of the frame has some serious flaws including:

  • The piece of glass that nests in the plastic frame is not secured and therefore could be broken if one is not careful.
  • The adjustable foot is “light weight” and feels like it could snap and break when compared to the way the rest of the frame is constructed.
  • The single speaker’s volume was barely audible, sounding almost as if the speaker was blown.
  • The remote control, when stored on the back of the frame, totally covers the speaker and further muffles the sound.
  • The WiFi adaptor hangs off the side in clear site instead of being hidden.

I also found some glitches with the internal functions of the Pandigital Frame including:

  • The clock’s 1/8th inch high numeric readout is very difficult to read.
  • There is no “snooze” functionality built into the alarm clock.
  • Fading from picture to picture in a slideshow was jumpy.
  • When Zoom function was engaged, the top of the picture as obstructed with a ½ inch darkened band that displayed the image’s file name, time and date.
  • The “back/previous” picture review function would not work.
  • There was an approximate 10 second delay from the time on pressed the zoom button to the actual zoomed up image being displayed.
  • Music files, loaded to internal memory, would NOT play when viewing a slideshow either streamed via WiFi or from an external memory card.

While I found the glitches, hiccups and design snafus of the Pandigital PAN7000DW a bit annoying; setting up the WiFi connectivity was exasperating.

Before I go into details, let’s be clear about WiFi connectivity in digital frame. A WiFi can be configured to communicate out through a router, over the internet and directly into a photo hosting website and/or it can be set to connect and pull pictures right off a local PC.

So while tedious and time consuming, I did find setting up WiFi connectivity to the 3 compatible photo hosting sites (Windows Frame It, SnapFish and Picasa) on the Internet was easy.

However, setting up the WiFi connectivity so that the frame could display pictures stored on a PC was SUPER exasperating.  First off, the instructions guiding one to set up a Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Server, published in Pandigital’s owner’s manual, are minimal and wrong. A 25 minute call to Pandigital Customer support finally resulted in some guidance that helped.  The polite support tech told me that while he had never actually set up this type of WiFi connectivity he assured me all that needed to be done was to make sure that the desired image files were being “shared” in Windows Media Player 11 and “the frame would do the rest.” So after spending some time fiddling, futzing and tweaking I finally got it to work. Well, it worked yesterday. Today is a whole new day and for some reason the Pandigital frame has lost its WiFi connection to the PC and the files it displayed yesterday. Why doesn’t it see the files it saw yesterday? I am not sure as nothing was changed.

After spending hours, reading manuals, searching the internet for solutions, reading online support information, being on hold, talking to customer support and then trial and error tweaking to get it to work yesterday I give up. I don’t have the time to figure out NOW what is going wrong. At this point this mundane Pandigital frame is just another lost cause and I am resigned to be another exasperated consumer.

Will HP’s DreamScreen Be A Marketing Nightmare?

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

HP DreamScreenLast week technology product review sites and blogs were all a-buzz about Hewlett Packard’s latest product release… the HP DreamScreen.  Because so much was being said I found myself enticed to read more and more. But the more I read the more I noticed a pattern develop. I noticed that many “industry experts” were confused and unsure as to what the DreamScreen is or is not supposed to be.

Below are 16 quotes from various technology gurus and geeks who grappled with their own understanding on just how to best describe what  the HP DreamScreen is and/or is not. As you read through these quotes note that what they have to say about the DreamScreen is quite varied, perplexing and at times contradictory. Regardless, I am pretty sure this is NOT the industry buzz HP wanted.

  • CNET ASIA-Crave “There are products which simply defy categorization.”
  • Tech News World “DreamScreen …is it some sort of hobbled tablet netbook, or is it a pumped-up digital photo frame?”
  • Business  Week “HP turns the digital photo frame into an electronic social calendar.“
  • Mashable “HP’s new DreamScreen Tablet is some type of hybrid between a computer, a digital photo frame, and a music player. “
  • Coolest Gadgets “In the case of the HP DreamScreen, it might not be fair to call it a digital photo frame.”
  • Venture Beat “It’s a category of computer that is suitable for casual use by broader, mainstream audiences who might use it while browsing TV.”
  • Geek.com “HP’s DreamScreen wants to be the iPod of digital photo frames.”
  • Yahoo Tech “Depending on how you look at it, the sleek new DreamScreen is either a very powerful digital photo frame or a fairly limited Internet tablet—take your pick.”
  • The Inquisitr “HP DreamScreen Shouldn’t Be Called A Digital Photo Frame.”
  • eHomeUpgrade “HP Launches the HP DreamScreen Infotainment Display“
  • Digital Picture Frame Review “I hesitate to call the DreamScreen just a digital picture frame, although it does do that. So it’s more than a frame – it truly is a new platform.”
  • Gadget Republic “You see, the DreamScreen is like a smart TV/lightweight laptop hybrid tablet that has plenty of interactivity and always-on connection via Wi-Fi but it serves the purpose of being an aesthetically pleasing media hub.”
  • CNET Crave “It sort of reminds me of a super-sized Chumby–another interesting jack-of-all-trades gadget that never really seemed to take off.”
  • PC Magazine “The DreamScreen is meant to act as a wireless gateway to the Internet and all of the digital media stored on your network and other home computers.”
  • Tech News World “HP has shared its dream with the world, but not everyone is sure what to make of it. The DreamScreen is much more than a digital picture frame, but much less than a tablet PC.”
  • PC World “But the DreamScreen, for me, is stuck in tablet purgatory. It’s not quite the tablet I want it to be and too expensive to justify as a replacement for the digital picture frame I never use.”

The more I read articles (with quote like these) the more I could not help but think that if the industry experts, whose business is to know and understand new technology, don’t understand what the DreamScreen is, then how does HP expect the consuming public to understand it and in turn buy it?

What finally solidified my concerns that HP has some marketing work to do on the DreamScreen was when I read a quote by Leslie Fiering of Gartner Research.  Ms Fiering, a vice president covering mobile computing concluded that “the DreamScreen appears to be an interesting product in search of a use.

So just what is the HP DreamScreen? Is it a tablet PC? Is it a Digital Frame? Is it  Social Calendar? Is it a Lite Weight TV? Or is it an Infotainment Display or possibly a Media Hub? Personally, from what I can deduce from my own reading, I think PC Magazine probably best describes what the HP DreamScreen is all about. However I won’t truly know until I actually set one up and and use it for awhile.

Regardless of what HP intended the DreamScreen to be, the industry is not getting it.

For more information about HP’s DreamScreen I recommend you visit the DreamScreen website.

Kodak EasyShare Digital Frame Frustration

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Kodak EasyShare M820For my second frame review I selected what I thought would be a simple and basic digital frame when I picked Kodak’s EasyShare M820. As I mentioned in my last review, when I review a frame I don’t just set it up, add a few pictures and then start writing. I feel that if I am going to do a fair review it is important that I actually use the frame for quite a few days and dig deep into all aspects of it to understand all it is and isn’t.

The Kodak EasyShare M820 digital photo frame is a basic stand alone card reader frame. However, it is important to note that it is a bit outdated due to the fact that most new digital frames in the market are now wifi. But it is what it is, and it is still for sale in the marketplace. As a card reader frame its pictures are accessed for display directly from any media card inserted into it. And/or the frame can also be loaded with up to 1000 pictures in its 128MB internal memory.

Because frame owners tend to keep and use their frames for years, the design and build quality of a frame is important. Overall Kodak has done an adequate job with the frames physical design. The look of the frame is not too flashy and not too trendy, which allows it to blend nicely into many decors. My only critique of frame’s physical design is that the plastics Kodak selected feel and look cheap. The plastic matte, surrounding the screen, is a bit too shiny and the plastic removable faceplate frame is a bit too dull.

When it comes to image quality and screen size I think Kodak could have done better. Unfortunately this EasyShare’s 8” screen is in the less desirable and awkward wide-screen format technically referred to as the 16:9 aspect ratio (Standard digital photo format ratio is 4:3). The screen’s resolution is 800 x 480 pixels. While color rendering was good, the overall image quality is not the clearest when compared to other frames. When looking at pictures being displayed on the Kodak frame I couldn’t help but think that they looked like someone had smeared a super thin coat of Vaseline over them. I also found that when viewing pictures at a 45° angle and less the picture darkened considerably.

Up until now it could be argued that my critique of this frame is a subjective opinion. So while opinion is one thing, experience is another. It was only after loading nearly 550 pictures, some video and music files in to the frame did my frustration level rise to the point that I wanted to box the thing back up and “just take it back.”

Major Points of Frame Frustration:

  • Picture organized on a PC in a file, sub-file and sub-sub-file order become a management nightmare when moved over to the M820’s internal memory. The ability to maneuver through files and sub-files, with the intent to select pictures for Slideshow viewing, is quite confusing and nearly impossible on the frame.
  • If the frame loses power you will lose the selections you made for Slideshow viewing and have to start all over again.
  • Images can be rotated for correct display; however, you will lose the rotation if power is lost. Also even though the image rotates the thumbnail continues to remain sideways.
  • The frame only shows pictures in .jpg format. Image files in the .bmp and .gif format will need to be reformatted for display in this frame.
  • Photos can be enlarged with a built-in tool called “Zoom.” However, you cannot lock a picture to a zoomed in view. The zoom view is lost once you move off the picture and on to the next. Also you never get an unobstructed view of a zoomed picture. When zoomed in the picture is covered with menu buttons, zoom bar adjustment buttons and the photo’s title bar.
  • There is a brightness adjustment built into the frame… however, when the tool is opened up a gray screen with the brightness level indicator bar drops over the image masking the actual image you have selected to judge your brightness adjustment on. Therefore you have to make the adjustment, and then back out of 2 menus to finally see the adjusted picture and check to see if the change is correct. The process of going in and out must be repeated until you are satisfied.
  • The frame comes with Kodak EasyShare Software. However, this software actually loads as two completely separate programs that do NOT communicate to each other. Photos edited and/or “decorated” in one program must be saved and then reopened in the Kodak Digital Display software that acts as a photo management tool and linking software connecting the PC to the actual frame.
  • The photo management tool built into the software allows you to build a Slideshow and place photos in a specific viewing order, however the frame will not recognize or display in that order.
  • While the Slide Duration view time was set to 5 seconds per picture, the actual viewing time varied anywhere from 7 to 10 seconds. This does not include the time it takes to transition out of one picture and into the next.
  • Slideshows put together in the software and activated in the frame would play. However, Slideshows created by selecting multiple photos stored in the internal memory would not play.
  • Even when a slideshow was playing an error message stating “Pictures & video could not be found” was displayed on the Slideshow Info bar.
  • Specific music files built into a Slideshow do not automatically play when the Slideshow is playing.   Figuring out just how to get them to play is not a simple process. However, once playing the Slideshow specific music does not automatically turn off once the source for image display reverts back to the images stored in internal memory.
  • The “Fade” transition function would not work consistently. Dissolve, pixilation, and boxing transitions would also randomly occur when “Fade” was selected as the transition type.
  • Music Files loaded in the internal memory seemed to have disappeared, but were finally found in a file labeled “Images.”
  • While the frame does have ability play audio, don’t expect much from the two extremely small (about 3/4 inches round) speakers located on the bottom of the backside.

I fought this frame for days… trying simply to set it up to store pictures, video and music files and then run a short Slideshow. While working with it I constantly found problems, inconsistencies and conflicts. It simply is not user friendly.  Searching to find solutions I read the 28 page User Guide in its entirety… more than once. Not finding answers in the User’s Guide I then went online to www.kodak.com /go/digitalframesupport for more help. There I found the “Extended User Guide” which was basically the same information as the User’s Guide with a little more info on how to use the software. I also tried to using the “Interactive Trouble Shooting & Repairs” tool. But this was no help either… too generalized.

At one point I even chatted with Kodak tech support for over 1 hour and 40 minutes trying to resolve the error message that had popped up on the screen. That message was, Source Folder moved/deleted. Recreate folder and Update my slideshow.” To resolve the problem the Kodak technician twice guided me through the process of reformatting the frame’s internal drive. But this did not help. I finally got rid of the error message when on my own accord I simply unplugged the frame. When I told the technician what I did to solve the problem and who had earlier stated he “…was supporting frames for almost 2 years now,“ then said “All we need to do is to play with the frame to familiarize ourselves with the options.”

FINAL VERDICT: To sum it all up I have to say that I would never personally own or give this Kodak EasyShare M820 Frame of Frustration to anyone.

Sony S-Frame: A Sleek and Shiny Digital Picture Frame, But…

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Sony S-FrameFor my first digital photo frame review, I selected the Sony S-Frame Model DPF-V1000. To be thorough, I actually set Sony’s frame up and used it for over two weeks. I wanted to dig into it  and really get to know and use the frame the way a consumer would. As I was taking my notes, I noticed that for every good thing I liked about the frame I always felt the need to qualify what I wrote with a “but” statement.

I selected Sony’s frame because recently there has been much talk about the design of the frames in Sony’s S-Frame series. I have to say the frame’s overall design is beautiful to look at; the fit and finish is perfect. But, as every designer knows, “good design is in the details” and it is in the details where the frame falls a little short. First, surprisingly there is no integrated holster/caddy to store the small remote control that comes with it. Next, I found that the frame’s trendy high gloss black finish with shiny chrome accents was a fingerprint magnet.  Also, because the rear leg extends back 6 ½ inches the frame can really only be viewed from the right side when it sits on shelf and takes up quite a bit of space on a night stand.  Finally, the frame’s sleek and modern design style, looking much like a miniature computer screen, would most likely clash with more traditional décors.

The DPF-V1000’s 10.2” LCD wide-screen picture is clear and bright… the quality you would expect from Sony. But, because the screen is a wide-screen (16:9 aspect ratio) a little less than 1/3 of the screen becomes useless black bands when viewing photos generated by most consumer cameras which are 4:3 aspect ratio. The black banding becomes even more awkward to look at when the frame is turned on end to portrait mode.

Surprisingly the frame, which looks hi-tech, relies on older card reader technology.  As a stand-alone frame, it accommodates all the popular card formats.  Pictures files can be moved from the card and into the frame’s 1GB of memory. But, I have to admit I was a bit perplexed as to whether the upload was complete after I moved my pictures over. A simple “Upload Complete” message would have saved the time it took to look around and confirm that the pictures were actually moved.  Also in this wireless age, I found that fiddling, futzing and fingerprinting the frame to load it with a new batch of pictures from a card was a frustrating and tedious task. A Blue Tooth adapter is available for the frame that retails for $249.99. The adapter would be an additional $29.99 for a total of $279.98.

Maybe to compensate for the fact that it is sold as a free standing frame, Sony packed it full of internal features. But, having to dig deep looking through layers and layers of menus to access those features is time consuming and confusing.  This coupled with the fact that for some reason the remote control required that I press the button numerous times in order for the frame to register my selection was extremely annoying.

While reviewing this frame, I learned that using an internal photo editing feature can be quite limiting. The frame’s Auto Touch -Up feature makes six basic corrections; but, going through the correction process with each picture one by one is quite slow and often results in a final “touched up” version that has negligible improvement.  Another feature called Creative Edit is a nice idea, but it is very limited in the choices it offers in the way of decorative borders and stamps. After using the photo frames built in picture editing, I came to the conclusion that ultimately it would be better to find a more robust PC or web solution (many of which are even free) for photo editing and decorative enhancement. It is also important that I note that photos edited in Photo Shop and converted to GIF file would not load onto the frame.

Finally, one of the features I was particularly interested in was the HDMI interface that would allow me to connect the frame to my Sony BRAVIA XBR LCD TV for big screen picture viewing. But, to make this connection I needed to dole out another $19.99 to purchase a special HDMI cable. Once connected, the show on my 46” TV screen had mixed results. New pictures that I shot using my camera’s super fine High Quality mode looked great on the TV.  Pictures I shot in the Normal Quality mode looked OK. Old paper prints that I had scanned and converted to a digital image looked OK when viewed on the frame, but looked horrible on the big screen. I realize this lack of quality is not due to a fault in the frame. My point is that while the HDMI connectivity feature is enticing, don’t expect that same clear image you get when viewing a small picture on a small screen to always transfer over to a larger screen.

FINAL VERDICT: I would have to say that considering the suggested list price of $249.99 the 10 Inch Sony S-Frame is an expensive sleek and shiny beauty on the outside, but cumbersome and perplexing on the inside.

Know Your Show & How You’ll Load: The Key to Avoiding Disappointment when Buying a Digital Frame

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Digital Picture Frames 8_4_09While digital frames keep evolving, consumer understanding stays pretty much the same… and can be misunderstood. Only after owning and using a frame does a consumer understand what their frame does and doesn’t do. So if you are in the market for a digital frame, answering these two seemingly simple questions will spare you disappointment later.

QUESTION 1: What do you want to SEE on your digital frame?

Now this might seem like a stupid question, but actually there are three content types to choose from when it comes to what a frame can possibly show. Of course there are frames dedicated solely to photo content. Then, while it is not highly desirable, there are some frames that can show short video content.  Finally, there are also frames that can accept information feeds that display instructional, marketing and/or news related content. Since not all frames show all content types, knowing what you want your frame to show will help guide and direct your purchasing decision. This leads us to the second question…

QUESTION 2: How will you connect to load & manage frame content?

Typically consumers don’t give this question much thought. Up until now they were typically sold on “stand-alone frames” (aka card reader frames) that offered what seemed to be a straightforward solution. Connecting to a frame to load it with photo content just by popping a card out of a camera and into the frame seemed simple enough. But over time, consumers with stand-alone frames began to understand that while it may have been simple to load the first time, the loading process becomes tedious as more pictures are taken. Plus, if the content requires any editing, doing so within a frame is an awkward undertaking, if it is even offered as a feature in the first place.

While connectivity to the frame controls content delivery, it does not always control what also is important to customers: content management. What shows, when it shows and how long it shows on the digital frame is content management. To make loading, managing and editing pictures simpler, frame manufactures are beginning to have their frames connect to a PC via WiFi or Bluetooth. Much like sending a document to a node printer connected on a network, content files stored on the PC can be to  “Node Frames” for display. Any editing would take place on the PC before sending.

Some Node Frames can also use the PC as a gateway middleman to a variety of Internet sites for content housed on the site. However, setting up and managing multiple connections from multiple sites to the middleman PC and then back into the Node Frame can be exasperating, tedious and difficult for most. Beware, this middleman PC approach to content delivery and management is currently being “sold” a simple Internet frame solution… but, in reality it can be a whole new approach to frame frustration.

Finally, there are true “Internet Frames” that are designed to connect directly to one site on the Internet via a wireless connection or through a traditional land line.  Unlike the Node Frame, that again depends the PC as content and management middleman, the true Internet Frame connects to one Internet site as the gateway access point to all desired frame content and content management. The Internet site is designed as a one stop content and management solution for the frame.  The site offers and manages all the functions related to picture hosting, content delivery, a variety of information feeds and even photo editing. Conflicts for access to and display time on the frame are eliminated because all content types are managed at one site.

Knowing a little more beyond what is being marketed and sold by most frame manufacturers will ultimately serve the consumer looking to buy a digital photo frame. Asking and answering two simple questions regarding what types of content they want to show and how they want to connect to load and then manage that content  on the digital frame will ultimately save them time, money and frustration… guaranteed.

So until the next post… that’s what CeivaJoe knows!

COMMENT

Take your Picture Show on the Road

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

With each passing day there seems to be yet another digital picture frame being introduced to the marketplace. Typically what’s offered as “new” to the market is really another company doing what others have done before. However two new products have been released that takes digital frames to a new place… literally. One is the Hama Digital Photo Album the other is Sondata’s Shake –A-Pix portable mini album.

Hama Photo AlbumHama Digital Photo Album

This digital “frame” is actually an electronic album used to store your favorite pictures to have ready to show when needed.

The Hama Digital Photo Album, with a 7” screen, it can fit in a pocket or purse. Its screen displays picture formats like JPEGS in 800×480 pixel resolutions. Operating on rechargeable batteries, its view time will last about 2 ½ hours on a full charge.

Like most digital frames, pictures can be transferred via the usual USB interface; and can store about 4GB of image files and supports the most common memory solutions like SD, SDHC and MM cards.

While pricing and release date have not yet been announced, the idea of a portable digital photo album looks like a promising idea.

Sondata Shake-A-Pix mini Digital AlbumSondata Shake A Pix

Borrowing the idea from the iPhone that uses shaking motion to engage functionality in some apps,  Sondata believes its tiny 2.4in photo frame, called Shake A Pix,  it is the world’s first portable digital photo album utilizing motion sensors. Quite simply…  shake it  to browse through your favorite photos.

This mini frame (and I do mean mini) has an internal memory of 32MB which, depending on file size ¸is just about enough memory to hold up to 170 jpeg or bitmap images. Photos are transferred into the 50g photo frame via USB connections.

The 5mm-thick photo frame measures 90x50mm has its own built in retractable stand. Its all powered by a tiny lithium-ion battery which can keep photos displayed for up to three hour on a single charge. Retail pricing for this mini album is expected to be $38.

Another Manufacturer Enters US Digital Picture Frame Market

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

Toshiba Digital Media FrameYesterday in New York Toshiba formally announced its entry into the digital picture frame market.

Surprised? You shouldn’t be. The TV monitor manufacturer, which has panels, designers, and brand recognition, has had digital photo frames in other markets outside the U.S.

Toshiba is calling their spin on digital frames a “Digital Media Frame” to stress the fact that they can do more than just show pictures once connected with Wi-Fi to the Internet.

“You can get digital photo frames today for $20 to $30, but this is more than that. We call them digital media frames because we are positioning them as devices to do much more than just show photos. These are more lifestyle devices that give you the news and weather and a range of other personalized content options,” said Louis Masses, Toshiba DAV group product planning director.

The frames will be released in an 8 and 10 inch version. Initial models offer a high-gloss floating-glass look in the 8-inch screen sizes, while the 10-inch model is looks similar to the company’s Deep Lagoon 2009 LCD TV design style.

The 8-inch Digital Media Frame comes with either black or white frame bezels. The white 8-inch DMF82XWU and the black 8-inch DMF82XKU will each carry $180 suggested retails. The 10-inch model will be offered only in a translucent black. The 10-inch DMF102XKU will have a suggested retail of $230. Both displays are said to be high-res, built-in speakers, and support for WMA and MP3 as well as Jpeg, TIFF and BMP.

CEIVA welcomes Toshiba to the growing list of manufacturers.

Connected Digital Photo Frames: Industry Report Validates CEIVA’s 9 Year Old Vision

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Connected SharedELECTRONICS.CA PUBLICATIONS, an electronics industry market research group, recently announced the availability of a new report they have compiled entitled “Wi-Fi Represents Strongest Opportunity in Global Connected Digital Photo Frame Market”.

According to the report, in the first half of 2009 prices for digital photo frames have dropped to affordable levels causing the  market for digital photo frames to take-off. However, due to the down turn in economic conditions and the trend to purchase digital photo frames as gifts, pre-loaded with personal pictures, most units purchased are still quite basic and lack advanced features such as connectivity to the Internet.

The report also states that it is expected that wireless-enabled internet connected photo frames will be a key growth sector and will grow at two times the rate of overall digital photo frames in 2010.

The report also goes on to make the following points:

• Worldwide unit shipments of all digital photo frames are expected to reach 50 million by 2013.

• Nearly 60% of US respondents to consumer survey identified integrated wireless connectivity as a desired feature on their next digital photo frame purchase.

• The total silicon opportunity for digital photo frame suppliers will exceed $550 million by 2013.

• Microcontrollers comprise the largest opportunity in non-wireless enabled devices.

• The BOM for a wireless 8-inch digital photo frame will fall below US$36 by 2013; the LCD, with the wireless module and the enclosure being the dominant cost items.

So while more frames will become connected to the internet, the industry still has yet to understand the value of having frames connected to each other. The importance of sharing photos easily across family & friends’ networked frames, via a secure sharing service such as CEIVA Picture Plan, is the primary reason why CEIVA owners value being “connected.”

Further details of Electronics.ca new Digital Photo Frame  Industry Report’s table of contents and ordering information can be found on HERE on their web site.

So until the next post… that’s what CeivaJoe knows!

COMMENT